LeftNavBar_Background_Color_Bar Bill Sargent for Congress > Click here and Go to the Home Page Your Are Here: Home > Index of Issues > FHA's Need for Funds See where Bill stands on the issues Take a look at Video Clips of Bill talking about the issues Contact the Bill Sargent for Congress Campaign Visit Bill's Facebook Page Tweet Bill from his Twitter Page Material Copyrighted but Permission to Use has been granted.  Guidelines Provided TableContents

Federal Housing Administration (FHA)
Nears Need for Taxpayer Funds

Source: The Wall Street Journal

The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) is expected to report that it could exhaust its reserves because of rising mortgage delinquencies, a development that could result in the agency needing to draw on taxpayer funding for the first time in its 78 year history, says the Wall Street Journal.

  • Created during the New Deal, the FHA insures lenders against potential losses.
  • This has helped the housing market by backing the mortgages of borrowers with down payments as little as 3.5 percent.
  • The FHA has given out one-third of total loans used to purchase homes last year.
  • However, the FHA insured around 739,000 loans that were delinquent, an increase of more than 100,000 a year ago.
Other Important Issues on this site
Benghazi: A Chronology - News Coverage
Fast & Furious: A Chronology
The Economy & Small Business
The Texas Voter ID Law
Obamacare - A Strategy to Defund
Holder in Contempt of Congress
Remarks at Crisis Pregnancy Center Dinner 9/13/12

These losses represent about 9.6 percent of its $1.08 trillion in guaranteed mortgages. Now, the FHA is projected to need more money to pay off its projected losses than it has in its reserves. Since the FHA has permanent and indefinite budget authority, there is speculation that it may automatically receive money from the U.S. Treasury.

However, the Obama administration is looking for ways to avert the need to receive funding from the Treasury. Some measures include raising mortgage insurance premiums and finalizing additional legal settlements with lenders in order to reduce the $700 million budget shortfall.

On the other end of the aisle, Republicans have argued in favor of reducing the maximum loan limits and raising minimum down payments. Similarly, limiting loans to borrowers below certain incomes would also help alleviate the situation.

Despite never relaxing its underwriting rules, the FHA suffered heavy losses during 2007 and 2008, when the housing market was at its worst.

Officials have resisted efforts to shut borrowers out of the market. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, for example, hasn't implemented a regulation that would limit borrowers debt levels by limiting the amount of cash sellers could contribute for borrowers closing costs.

So what got us into this mess? I believe we have gotten away from following the Constitution. There is nothing I can find in that document that would authorize the Department of Housing and Urban Development or the FHA. Because the Constitution does not specifically authorize such programs then this authority is automatically given to states under the tenth amendment. Each state has the authority to decide for itself whether having such a loan guarantee program is appropriate and if its taxpayers want to take on this economic liability.

Now don't take this the wrong way. As a former Realtor and Broker I saw many situations where first time buyers needed the help of an FHA loan in order to purchase a home. The problem is that the road to economic destruction is covered with good intensions. We need to think and act for the long term. Short term objectives may look good but we always need to consider the long term impact of our actions on our nation's economy.