LeftNavBar_Background_Color_Bar Go to Home Page of Your Historical News Source Your Are Here: Home > News Columns > Taxes: The "Fair Tax" -- A Different Point of View See where Bill stands on the issues Take a look at Video Clips of Bill talking about the issues National Security Issues Coverage of Foreign Policy Issues Coverage of Foreign Policy Issues Coverage of Foreign Policy Issues Coverage of Foreign Policy Issues Coverage of Foreign Policy Issues Coverage of Foreign Policy Issues Coverage of Foreign Policy Issues Visit Bill's Facebook Page Tweet Bill from his Twitter Page You may use anything on this site provided attribution is included You may use anything on this site provided attribution is included Contact Sarge TableContents
Last Week?
Taking a Look at the case for
A Flat Tax
  Next Week?
Hurricanes Happen
But will the "Ike Dike?"
Minority Opinion on the "Fair Tax" by Bill Sargent

Differing Points of View
on the "Fair Tax"

A Minority Opinion by Bill Sargent,
one of the Three Musketeers
Go to the Majority Opinion


March 17, 2014

On most issues the “Three Musketeers” agree. With the Fair Tax, however, there are some differences. 

The three of us agree that the current tax system needs fixing, that we should move away from an income-based tax, that those being taxed should be aware of how much they are paying in taxes, and that there should not be double taxation. 

We also agree that it would be good to repeal the 16th amendment and eliminate the agency (the IRS) that has so much power it can target, harass, and yes, even abuse taxpayers just because they disagree with the political point of view of the administration in the White House.

And we also agree that everybody should pay something. Like Margaret Thatcher is quoted in the movie The Iron Lady  “If you live in this county you must pay for the privilege, something, anything, if you pay nothing you care nothing.”

The differences come when you actually start reading the legislation (H.R. 25).  Nancy Pelosi said you need to pass the bill (ObamaCare) in order to know what is in it!  We all know what a disastrous mistake that was!  One needs to be careful when enacting legislation to make sure there are no unintended consequences.

For example, the tax rate being considered is over 25%.  What would keep the Congress from increasing this tax rate if they are unable to curb their voracious appetite for spending?  If one is to have a Fair Tax, one needs amend the Constitution to limit the tax rate and require voter approval if that amount is to be increased.  That is what we do at a local level; why not require it at the Federal level of government as well?

Additionally, I don’t like the idea of the Federal Government handing out checks -- equal to the amount of the tax a person at the poverty level would pay -- to every person in the country (“pre-bates”).  Doing this just reinforces the mindset that the Federal Government is the source of money -- when it isn’t!  Instead, I’d much prefer to exempt from tax items that are deemed essential to life such as basic foods, prescriptions, and the like -- things that are needed for basic survival but not things like alcohol, tobacco and snack foods.

But let’s be honest, in order for Fair Tax become a reality we need people in Congress who are not so influenced by special interests that they can make it happen.  Because this would require the repeal of the 16th amendment, we also need state legislators who will support this repeal.  This will not happen until there is widespread support among the people of our nation. 

The “Three Musketeers” believe the Fair Tax approach makes a lot of sense, even though we have our differences on how to implement it.

Bill

[Go to the Majority Opinion by John and Mark]

 

 

2