LeftNavBar_Background_Color_Bar Go to Home Page of Your Historical News Source Your Are Here: Home > Weekly News Columns > America's Trade Deficit See where Bill stands on the issues Take a look at Video Clips of Bill talking about the issues National Security Issues Coverage of Foreign Policy Issues Coverage of Foreign Policy Issues Coverage of Foreign Policy Issues Coverage of Foreign Policy Issues Coverage of Foreign Policy Issues Coverage of Foreign Policy Issues Coverage of Foreign Policy Issues Visit Bill's Facebook Page Tweet Bill from his Twitter Page You may use anything on this site provided attribution is included You may use anything on this site provided attribution is included Contact Sarge TableContentse

Last Week:
Stay the Course

Header Graphic of Bill Sargent, Mark Mansius, and John Gay, the Three Musketeers

Next Week:
The Federal Government
and Healthcare

America's Trade Deficit

April 10, 2017

Recently the US trade deficit had risen to nearly five year highs.  Countries wisely measure their balance of trade subtracting goods/services imported from goods/services exported.  When there are more imports than exports, a deficit occurs.  In 2016, the U.S. deficit increased to $500 Billion (a loss of 3% to our economy). 

Negative of trade deficits, in part, forces us to borrow money and lose the benefit of employment.  The U.S. has experienced a deficit since the 1970’s being driven by oil imports in the early decades, but more recently imbalances are due to imports of autos, toys and electronics. We have also experienced an export of middle class employment, mainly from the manufacturing sector.  

Trade is an essential part of our country’s economy.  If one nation possesses an abundance of an important resource not available in another the two solve this imbalance by establishing trade agreements.  But when a country unfairly takes advantage of another to create negative imbalances, they harm the economy of the other. 
Take NAFTA as an example.  Prior to NAFTA, U.S. Mexico trade bounced back and forth between positive and negative trade balances.  Since NAFTA, the imbalance has remained negative to the U.S., exploding to $65 billion last year alone. 

America’s trade deficit is primarily from four nations: 
China (50%), Mexico (15%), Germany (15%), and Japan (15%). 
The President recently signed two executive orders empowering Secretary of Commerce Ross, to begin investigating trade improprieties.  “There’s never been a systematic examination, country by country and major product by major product, of why do we have the deficit,”  Trump said.  He added some are “innocent,” for example “oil.”  “But there’s a lot that’s due to cheating, there’s a lot due to dumping, there’s a lot that’s due to subsidies that are illegal.”  Often it takes a long time to impose remedies such as antidumping and countervailing duties on foreign companies/nations.  Meanwhile the damage to U.S. companies has already been inflicted.  Something needs to be done to speed up the relief for U.S. firms.

Trump gave us another example where cheaters set up shell companies with no assets against which trade violations can be levied.  He added future practices should require companies to be bonded before they can trade in us.

We acknowledge world trade is critical to the U.S.  It is essential for our economic health and well being.  However, we cannot continue to allow cheaters to use unfair trade practices such as tax benefits and subsidies granted by foreign nations therefore lowering their costs of imports, or one-sided protective practices through high import taxes employed by foreign governments.  Not paying due attention to trading practices over the past several decades has resulted in loss of our national wealth and self-sufficiency.  Hardest hit is the middle-class worker, particularly in skilled manufacturing jobs.  

The President and his Commerce Secretary have already begun the most important task of resolving  unfair trade practices.  If they’re successful it will have the effect of returning offshore wealth to our nation and sparking investment in America again.

Mark, Bill and John

E 2