Header Graphic for Sarges.com Go to Home Page of Your Historical News Source LeftNavBar_Background_Color_Bar Visit News Columns written by Bill Sargent Check out Sarge's FaceBook page Visit Sarge's Twitter Page Send a message to Sarge via a Webform Visit Sarge's 2018 campaign Website Visit the Department of Justice - FBI Archived pages Visit the archived National Security Web pages Visit the archived Foreign Policy Pages Visit the archived immigration reform pages Visit the archived pages about the Economy Visit the archived 2nd Amendment web pages Visit archived political stories Authorization to copy items from this website You are here > Home > News Columns > Census Citizenship Question Neither New nor Wrong

The Rule of Law
Census Citizenship Question Neither New nor Wrong
Red Flag Laws, Proceed Cautiously

Thumbnail image of Pelican Island deep water port column

June 22, 2019
The Galveston County Daily News

This month the U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether a citizenship question should be included in the 2020 census. This question has been part of our census since 1820 until 2010 when the Obama Administration removed it.  It was first included at the request of Thomas Jefferson “for the purpose of more exactly distinguishing the increase of population by birth and immigration.”  So it’s not new!

Please note that the citizenship question does not ask about a person’s legal status; it has nothing to do with immigration enforcement.  The census data is strictly controlled and can only be used for statistical analysis.

Article I Section 2 of our Constitution mandates that a census (“enumeration”) be taken every ten years. The information is used for a myriad of purposes.  One is to determine how many members of the House of Representatives a state may have. 

So, why all the uproar about including a citizenship question in the decennial census?

Federal law restricts voting rights to only U.S. citizens.  It stands to reason that the number of people representing us in Congress should be based upon the number of citizens as opposed to the overall population.  After all if non-citizens are prohibited from voting and aren’t suppose to have the rights and privileges of citizenship why would anybody want to base the number of House members upon an inflated number?  Basing the number of House districts in Congress on total population dilutes the representation of actual citizens. The Supreme Court found in Reynolds vs. Sims, “to the extent that a citizen’s right to vote is debased, he is that much less a citizen.”

Those opposed to including the citizenship question are saying if you include it, non-citizens will not respond to the census questionnaire.  They suggest non-citizens (especially those who have entered the county illegally) will be concerned that they could be rounded up and deported. As mentioned above, there’s a prohibition on such use of the census data.  Besides statistics show that there was approximately the same response rate for the 2010 census (that didn’t have the citizenship question)  as the previous decennial censuses.

So why the opposition? Perhaps we’re seeing a continuation of what’s happening all too often these days: efforts being driven by politicians who hope to gain votes and more power while further splitting the nation and instilling fear and distrust among our population.  

It’s important to know how many people live in our country, citizens and non-citizens.  It’s also important to know their ethnic background.  Under the Voting Rights Act we’re required to protect minority voters; drawing voting districts so they have the opportunity to elect representatives of their choosing.  We’re even required to provide translators at polling places based upon the ethnic make up of the population.  In Harris County that’s over four different languages!

The bottom line?  We need to determine the overall population and the number of citizens. Doing so will ensure the appropriate number of House districts in each state without diluting the voting power of citizens.

Author and Columnist
Photo of Bill (Sarge) Sargent
June 22, 2019